HEARD’s disability research has been named in UNICEF’s Best Research for 2016.
A pilot study conducted by HEARD researchers at UKZN on the hidden cost of disability in South Africa has been named in UNICEF’s Best Research in 2016.
UNICEF - the United Nations Children’s Emergency Fund - is a United Nations programme which provides humanitarian assistance and development to mothers and children in the developing world.
Researchers at HEARD – the Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division - conducted their work in partnership with the South African Department of Social Development (DSD), the National Development Agency (NDA), the UN Partnership to Promote the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA).
Hailed by UNICEF for its innovation, the study by Dr Jill Hanass-Hancock and Ms Nicola Deghaye explores the economic impact of disability on households, a field in which is relatively unexplored in South Africa today. Working within the broader themes of HEARD’s efforts towards advancing health equity in Africa, the study provides a magnified outlook into the country’s health landscape, one which should consider the disabled.
Taking into consideration the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), an international treaty aimed at protecting the rights of persons with disabilities worldwide, the study explored the extent to which the government of a middle-income country would be able to provide proper care and resources to those living with disabilities and to their families.
The study found that the concept of a more ‘disability-inclusive development’ was essential to equity. This would necessitate the inclusion of the disabled into all systems of society, which would not only advance the position of the disabled person in society, but also allow for disabled citizens to make greater contributions to overall development.
While the study’s primary focus was on the cost impact for people living with disabilities and their families, what emerged was that cost also had a social burden on the disabled as they were often not properly assimilated into society.
More than just examining costs to institutions, the study explored how economically vulnerable households with disabled people were, and how this would impede larger societal developmental goals.
The study, which considered factors such as opportunity and out-of-pocket costs and different types and degrees of disability, found that a lesser financial burden on the disabled and their families/carers would advance the lives of the disabled significantly.
A very significant factor examined in the study was that spending varies depending on disability type, the level of support needed and the economic status of the family. Other costs, such as transport, caregiver assistance, communication devices and maintenance of assistive devices emerged as major drivers of out-of-pocket costs. These expenses could be detrimental to those in low-income households or those dependent on social grants.
The study provided recommendations such as legislative reform, better allocation of resources and the development of a broader understanding of the economic vulnerability the disabled faced to address the problem of assimilation. Other key suggestions include access to inclusive education, caregiver support, affordable assistive devices, sustainable employment for the disabled, better co-ordination of health services and the inclusion of the disabled in the design process of housing and transport systems.
Research partnerships such as this one, conducted with government and developmental institutions, lead the way for reform and better health and social services for those living with disabilities. This promotes a more aware, rights-based and inclusive social system which has the potential to provide equity through health care.